Clinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy: The movement disorder society criteria.

TitleClinical diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy: The movement disorder society criteria.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2017
AuthorsHöglinger GU, Respondek G, Stamelou M, Kurz C, Josephs KA, Lang AE, Mollenhauer B, Müller U, Nilsson C, Whitwell JL, Arzberger T, Englund E, Gelpi E, Giese A, Irwin DJ, Meissner WG, Pantelyat A, Rajput A, van Swieten JC, Troakes C, Antonini A, Bhatia KP, Bordelon Y, Compta Y, Corvol J-C, Colosimo C, Dickson DW, Dodel R, Ferguson L, Grossman M, Kassubek J, Krismer F, Levin J, Lorenzl S, Morris HR, Nestor P, Oertel WH, Poewe W, Rabinovici G, Rowe JB, Schellenberg GD, Seppi K, van Eimeren T, Wenning GK, Boxer AL, Golbe LI, Litvan I
Corporate AuthorsMovement Disorder Society-endorsed PSP Study Group
JournalMov Disord
Volume32
Issue6
Pagination853-864
Date Published2017 06
ISSN1531-8257
KeywordsHumans, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Societies, Medical, Supranuclear Palsy, Progressive
Abstract

BACKGROUND: PSP is a neuropathologically defined disease entity. Clinical diagnostic criteria, published in 1996 by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke/Society for PSP, have excellent specificity, but their sensitivity is limited for variant PSP syndromes with presentations other than Richardson's syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to provide an evidence- and consensus-based revision of the clinical diagnostic criteria for PSP.

METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Cochrane, Medline, and PSYCInfo databases for articles published in English since 1996, using postmortem diagnosis or highly specific clinical criteria as the diagnostic standard. Second, we generated retrospective standardized clinical data from patients with autopsy-confirmed PSP and control diseases. On this basis, diagnostic criteria were drafted, optimized in two modified Delphi evaluations, submitted to structured discussions with consensus procedures during a 2-day meeting, and refined in three further Delphi rounds.

RESULTS: Defined clinical, imaging, laboratory, and genetic findings serve as mandatory basic features, mandatory exclusion criteria, or context-dependent exclusion criteria. We identified four functional domains (ocular motor dysfunction, postural instability, akinesia, and cognitive dysfunction) as clinical predictors of PSP. Within each of these domains, we propose three clinical features that contribute different levels of diagnostic certainty. Specific combinations of these features define the diagnostic criteria, stratified by three degrees of diagnostic certainty (probable PSP, possible PSP, and suggestive of PSP). Clinical clues and imaging findings represent supportive features.

CONCLUSIONS: Here, we present new criteria aimed to optimize early, sensitive, and specific clinical diagnosis of PSP on the basis of currently available evidence. © 2017 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

DOI10.1002/mds.26987
Alternate JournalMov. Disord.
PubMed ID28467028
PubMed Central IDPMC5516529
Grant ListP30 AG010124 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
103838 / WT_ / Wellcome Trust / United Kingdom
P01 AG017586 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States
MC_U105597119 / MRC_ / Medical Research Council / United Kingdom
P50 NS053488 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
R01 DC012519 / DC / NIDCD NIH HHS / United States
K-1501 / PUK_ / Parkinson's UK / United Kingdom
R01 NS089757 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
MR/L016397/1 / MRC_ / Medical Research Council / United Kingdom
/ WT_ / Wellcome Trust / United Kingdom
U54 NS092089 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
MC_UU_00005/12 / MRC_ / Medical Research Council / United Kingdom
G0700943 / MRC_ / Medical Research Council / United Kingdom
K23 NS088341 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
G1100643 / MRC_ / Medical Research Council / United Kingdom
R01 AG038791 / AG / NIA NIH HHS / United States